Friday, October 17, 2008

The theory of life energy

Who created the “food chain and the food web”? I am not saying about the biologist who discovered it.. My 12th class books say that there is a continuous transfer of energy from lower “tropics” to the higher ones… this energy transfers in terms of food and only 10% of energy is transferred from one level to another.. what energy is? Its the capacity to do work..

What is work? I believe every thing we do in our life is some sort of work.. Living is work n same is loving even hating!! And for all these works we use some energy.. When we try to help some one some of our energy is transferred and the energy heals n helps.. The law of conservation of energy is not valid locally. I mean when we transmit some of our energy we don’t loose it rather our efficiency to trap more energy increases.. Similarly when we hurt some one we gain some negative energy ie we loose some energy n our trapping power reduces..

There is a threshold of energy level which we all have to maintain. And our deeds determine our current level. Above the threshold we live and die if current level falls below threshold.. This energy which we are talking bout is limited one.. And we are the channels. We give more, we get more. It ends here for almost everyone, But not for me. There is an unlimited yet untapped reservoir of this ultimate energy. Does it exist? Yes it does.. Mythological devils have been meditating to please God. Why? Just To get access to this source. They gain a huge amount of energy but their deeds eventually bring their energy level below the threshold and they die. This energy is referred as “karma”.. The determinant of “punya” n “paap”.. LIFE or DEATH

This energy has been the pursuit of sadhus and mahatmas throughout ages. But the path is still obscure. One of them is to love all. We need to find this to bring out the revolution we seek within us.. like we have different forms of energy, the purest form of “life energy” is love. So why stop loving??

1 comment:

Surya said...

1- Understanding food chain - A parallel thought
Good topic to begin but honestly you have not given a serious thought to it. This I attempt to explain from the point of view of thermodynamics. Its my view and hence open for questioning and debate. "Energy is that which remains when matter vanishes" - this is how I view energy. So every matter that you see around (be solid, liquid or gas) can be viewed as energy pockets. Now in thermodynamics we have something called as entropy which is nothing but a tendency of a matter to proceed towards a state of disorderliness. So going by the definition, every solid tends to become a liquid and every liquid has a tendency to go towards a gaseous phase since the later has highest form of disorderliness. We can also view it from a different angle - every matter combines with another to lose its existence and hence become disorderly. This is why there is always a abundance of molecules and compounds that atoms and elements. If you remember the elementary thermodynamics, you must have been taught that molecules form when their energy is lower than their corresponding elements. Now the very fact something's energy level is "decreasing" means that energy has been released, so the system has traveled towards disorderliness. So the central thesis is either things degenerate or combine (or get engulfed) to function according to law of entropy. This analogy can be used to explain "food chains". In the food chains lower size matter gets engulfed/destroyed by higher size matter. The fundamental however stays same - increasing entropy by facilitating in increase in energy. Now this you can call a theory..what say? :-)

2-The Work-Energy interface
Energy is NOT the capacity to do work. Rather work is a visual manifestation of energy. Remember what is the unit of energy - its joules and the unit of work is also - joules ! So they are the same. Rather you recognize the existence of energy by visualizing work. Work is nothing but a tangible definition of energy. When you say that energy is a capacity to do work, you actually misdirect in believing that both are different concepts. Work is a quantified notification of the energy level that is used in a different functions. By saying that energy is a capacity to do work, you propose to say that you do know about the absolute energy level present in a being/system. This is verily wrong since no one knows the absolute value and by watching the work, one gets a relative knowledge about the energy in a system. But again its RELATIVE. The same energy may not be manifesting in different functions.

3- Action/Function & Work - A diff
Everything we do in our life is NOT work as stated by you. Going back to the formula for work its Force X Displacement.Give a critical look - everything in life do we use force? Some things happen out of grace of God (or luck) and displaces us. Work is when one uses force from self and displaces one self to another level of action, thinking or spirit. Our mind is never still and thoughts are so random repeatedly displacing us to higher level and lower level. Now these "higher" and "lower" are pretty relative terms and the only way is to take the current state as neutral to measure. Coming back to argument, you do not say this random displacement without force as work. They I define actions/functions which are seeped into our being, what you call as "karma". One has to "work" against these actions to rectify oneself. So there is a difference my friend. Anything that is spontaneous is not work - loving and hating are spontaneous things and so is helping. You tried to build up a scientific argument but its not clear what you want to say by relating these to law of conservation of energy. Needs a structured rethinking...

4-I quote you -"There is a threshold of energy level which we all have to maintain. And our deeds determine our current level. Above the threshold we live and die if current level falls below threshold.. This energy which we are talking bout is limited one.. And we are the channels. We give more, we get more."

Firstly you must know that you are making a very dangerous conclusion on life and death by talking of energy level. Life and death is a complex phenomenon and is a function of many things in and beyond our control. How do define the existence of a mentally retarded person? Going by your definition, the mad man dies the moment he loses his mind.Well lets stay clear from these superficial judgments. Know that energy levels are divided among three states - the body, mind and spirit. The mad man eats only and survives. The sage eats not a morsel and survives. And people like us require everything and survive. So all these concepts of thresholds are of no value in explaining life and death. It is a still a open research question.

Secondly you say that the energy "we are talking is limited one" yet you argue that we are channels of it ! How do you know we have limited energy? And drawing from your previous blog of challenging destiny where you argue that we are the most superior beings, how do you propose to be superior with limited energy? And can we be channels of limited energy? Then there is always a depletion of energy with progress of time. And it will be against the law of entropy ! This is paradoxical and hence the entire passage needs a rethinking. Do the needful...

5- No doubt one of the paths is "love all"...but then what is love? How do you really love and why at all there must a "stop" in love? All this needs deeper thinking. I can elaborate but then its blog and I hand over you the honour... :-)